Commandant: Marines need more troops for the 'long war'

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Marine Corps may need to grow to sustain commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan and remain ready for other crises, the force's new commander said on Wednesday.

Gen. James Conway also said he saw a mismatch between the views of his troops and those of American civilians on the time needed to train Iraqi forces and the nature of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Conway said the Marines' present strength of around 180,000 troops was sufficient for peacetime but he added: "Where the force is engaged and is more stressed, I think that that number needs to somewhat be more variable."

Commitments in Iraq and Afghanistan meant the Marines were well below their target of allowing units to spend 14 months at home for every seven-month deployment, Conway said.

Conway, who took over as Marine Corps commandant last week, said he had asked his staff to work out how to achieve the target and meet the Marines' requirements to the country.

"There's two ways that you approach that -- one is reducing the requirement, the other is potentially growing the force for what we call the long war," he told reporters at the Pentagon.

Conway noted several groups -- including a bipartisan panel co-chaired by former Secretary of State James Baker -- are preparing advice on Iraq strategy and said he would await the outcome of that process before making any recommendations.

TRAINING LIMITED

Conway said he had enough forces for another crisis but training for fighting such as jungle warfare and large-scale maneuvers had been severely limited by Iraq and Afghanistan.

"Our Marine Corps has become, I think, a very counter-insurgency capable force but we're not providing to the nation some of the other things that we should be able to do in virtually any other nature of contingency," he said.

There are 23,000 Marines in Iraq and 150 in Afghanistan, although they have had larger contingents there in the past.

The Marines' main presence in Iraq is in the restive western province of Anbar, where they are focusing on training Iraqi security forces to take on insurgents.

Conway said training Iraqi forces was a long process and indicated some concern that American public opinion was not prepared to give U.S. forces the time needed to do the job.

"Unfortunately I think that the timeline that we see that it would take to build a fully capable, competent force and for us to feel comfortable stepping away is longer than the timeline that we probably feel now that our country will support," he said.

Critics of the Iraq war say it has been a diversion from the fight against al Qaeda but Conway said the Marines were killing people in Iraq who would otherwise be trying to "work their way into Baltimore harbor or Los Angeles airport."

Read the rest at the Washington Post

Related Link:
Pentagon Study to recommend troop increase

Related Link:
Bush, in visit to Vietnam, says we'll win in Iraq "unless we quit"

Related Link:
2,200 more reserve force Marines heading to Anbar

Related Link:
Debate Grows Over Beefing Up U.S. Force in Iraq

Related Link:
Marines in Iraq Expanding Adviser Teams

Related Link:
Pentagon: 57,000 troops to deploy early next year

Related Link:
Report: Bush plans "last big push"; Baker commission to comply

Related Link:
New Iraq deployments could stretch Reserve Force

Related Link:
Army seeks to increase rotation through reassignment of specialists to 'high-demand roles'

Related Link:
Report: U.S. building massive permanent base in north Iraq

Related Link:
Marines plan recalling reserve combat battalions for 2nd tours in 2008

Related Link:
Secretary of AF: Airmen to remain in Iraq past 2010

Related Link:
Army: Troops to stay in Iraq until 2010

Related Link:
Expert: Iraq army has only 50% chance of success, no U.S. troop reductions foreseeable