Wednesday, June 27, 2007

Report: More Afghanis killed by coalition than by militants; Karzai says 90 dead in 10 days, Afghan lives 'not cheap'; U.S. says no changes needed


Above: Afghani boys walk to school in the village of Mostowfi during coalition operations there on June 2. Left: Afghan president Hamid Karzai.

In the wake of a series of high-profile incidents in which U.S. and NATO attacks have killed Afghan civilians, a senior American officer with responsibility for both forces says allied procedures for avoiding civilian casualties are adequate.

Speaking via satellite from Bagram Air Base near Kabul, Brigadier General Joseph Votel says the recent incidents involving large numbers of civilian casualties have not resulted in any new procedures.

"No, there's no particularly new procedures that we are using right now," he said. "We think the procedures we have in place are good. They work. They help us minimize the effects on this."

General Votel, the deputy commander for operations in both the U.S.-led coalition and the NATO force in eastern Afghanistan, says NATO and coalition officers use "accepted" procedures and take "extensive measures" to avoid civilian casualties, and succeed in hundreds of operations. He says his forces "absolutely regret" any civilian casualties they cause, but he says Taleban fighters expose civilians to danger by operating in, or fleeing to, populated areas.

"I won't say every instance, but in the large majority of these incidents where we unfortunately do have a civilian injury or death or we cause some damage, in most cases these are caused principally by insurgents who are initiating activities in the direct proximity of villages or where civilians are located," he said.

On Saturday, President Karzai accused NATO and U.S. forces of carelessness in their approach to protecting Afghan civilians. He said, "Afghan life is not cheap and should not be treated as such." He said NATO and U.S. forces had killed 90 Afghan civilians during the previous 10 days. He did not provide details, or present figures for Taliban attacks.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Defense Department could not provide figures for the number of Afghan civilians killed in fighting this year. A count by the Associated Press indicates that 203 Afghan civilians died as a result of NATO and coalition operations since January, while Taleban fighters killed 178.

The news agency quotes the United Nations office in Afghanistan as having slightly higher figures, attributing 207 civilian deaths to the foreign forces and 213 to the Taleban. AP also quotes an Afghan group (ABCAR) as counting 230 civilians killed by U.S. and NATO troops, with no figure reported for Taliban killings.

A senior researcher at Human Rights Watch in New York, John Sifton, says it is difficult to know whether civilian casualties in Afghanistan have increased this year because the level of fighting changes from month to month. But he says the fact that Taleban forces put civilians at risk does not justify U.S. or NATO forces unnecessarily endangering those civilians. Still the human rights researcher says it is not reasonable to compare the civilian deaths caused by U.S. and NATO forces to those caused by the Taleban.

"The Taleban is committing violations of the Laws of War in almost everything they do," he said. "NATO and the United States, by contrast, is not setting out to violate the Laws of War across the board. However, they're failing to take precautions in a lot of cases, and may occasionally cross the line and violate the Laws of War themselves."

Sifton says Taleban fighters hide among civilians, and even when they attack military targets they do so in civilian areas and use high explosives that are bound to kill many people. He says NATO and U.S. forces are more careful, but he says they still rely too much on highly-destructive air strikes in populated areas.

"NATO, obviously, does take many precautions to avoid civilian casualties," Sifton said. "There's no doubt about it. The concern that we have, and that many human rights activists on the ground have, is that they're not doing enough."

In one of the most recent incidents, NATO troops tracking a Taleban force fleeing toward the Pakistan border Saturday fired a rocket that local reports say killed at least nine Pakistani civilians. Pakistan criticized the incident, and said all military activity on its side of the border should be done by its own forces. General Votel defended the rocket strike, saying the commander operated within the established Rules of Engagement.

"In this particular situation, the commander on the ground determined that he needed to continue to address that threat until it was eliminated," he said. "And that included firing into areas that were in Pakistan."

The general expressed regret for any civilian casualties in Pakistan and says the results of the attack are being investigated. But he says the Taleban force crossed from Pakistan, attacked a NATO unit and then fled back into Pakistan. General Votel says communications with Pakistani military units are good, and efforts are made to coordinate anti-Taliban operations on both sides of the border.

From VOA

Related Link:
Report: Record opium crop in southern Afghanistan

Related Link:
Report: Gates seeks 3000 trainers, 3000 combat troops for Afghanistan

Related Link:
Gates: 'Fairly substantial flow of weapons' going to Taliban from Iran

Related Link:
General McNeill: Iran may be aiding Taliban to hedge bets, cites improving tactics

Related Link:
Report: Second, more powerful EFP found in Afghanistan, this time in Kabul

Related Link:
Requests from Afghanistan commanders for more trainers going unmet

Related Link:
General: Afghanistan needs more troops, money; Development of police 'several years behind' Afghan Army

Related Link:
Gates: Iranian weapons moving into Afghanistan

Related Link:
Afghan Army Chief Seeks Independent Army

Related Link:
Report: UK military to urge that Britain withdraw from Iraq in 12 months, focus on Afghanistan

Related Link:
Report: UK military to urge that Britain withdraw from Iraq in 12 months, focus on Afghanistan

Related Link:
'Officials': Iran increasing weapons shipments to Iraq, Afghanistan, including 240mm rocket with 30-mile range used against 'green zone'

Related Link:
NATO: EFP found in Afghanistan 'considerably similiar' to 'those made in Iraq'

Related Link:
Blair: Iran arming Taliban against West

Related Link:
UK 'Senior Army Source': Iran supplying Taliban with weapons including surface-to-air missiles

Related Link:
Pentagon: Extra Afghanistan troops to stay into 2008

Related Link:
Pace: U.S. intercepted Iranian weapons headed to Taliban in Afghanistan

Related Link:
Pentagon extends tours to 15 months for all active-duty army troops in Iraq, Afghanistan; Guard, Reserve, Marines excepted

Related Link:
Perspective: America's forgotten war

Related Link:
Commandant Conway: More Marines to Afghanistan to 'train' forces

Related Link:
Bush seeks money for 8,229 more troops; 4,729 for Iraq, 3,500 for Afghanistan

Related Link:
General Craddock: Troops still lacking for Afghanistan

Related Link:
Perspective: Iraq made Afghanistan an orphan

Related Link:
Perspective: Unit finds Iraq and Afghanistan are worlds apart

Related Link:
Bush Extends Stay for 3,200 Troops in Afghanistan

Related Link:
Unit for Iraq to be redeployed to Afghanistan